1864 Presidential Election
| Jurisdiction | Lincoln | McClellan |
|---|---|---|
| Sum | 72,750 69.7% |
31,599 30.3% |
| Adair• | 797 83.1% |
162 16.9% |
| Andrew• | 1,141 95.0% |
60 5.0% |
| Atchison• | 639 98.9% |
7 1.1% |
| Audrain• | 126 24.3% |
392 75.7% |
| Barry• | 197 92.1% |
17 7.9% |
| Barton• | 23 100.0% |
0 0.0% |
| Bates• | 27 67.5% |
13 32.5% |
| Benton• | 574 96.5% |
21 3.5% |
| Bollinger• | 243 95.3% |
12 4.7% |
| Boone• | 262 24.4% |
813 75.6% |
| Buchanan• | 1,914 70.2% |
813 29.8% |
| Caldwell• | 496 84.9% |
88 15.1% |
| Callaway• | 274 22.1% |
965 77.9% |
| Camden• | 468 99.8% |
1 0.2% |
| Cape Girardeau• | 1,213 68.8% |
551 31.2% |
| Carroll• | 285 71.6% |
113 28.4% |
| Cass• | 76 42.0% |
105 58.0% |
| Cedar• | 297 100.0% |
0 0.0% |
| Chariton• | 363 99.5% |
2 0.5% |
| Christian• | 557 99.1% |
5 0.9% |
| Clark• | 997 88.6% |
128 11.4% |
| Clay• | 216 21.8% |
777 78.2% |
| Clinton• | 297 37.6% |
492 62.4% |
| Cole• | 1,256 71.4% |
502 28.6% |
| Cooper• | 939 71.1% |
381 28.9% |
| Crawford• | 297 49.2% |
307 50.8% |
| Dade• | 507 99.2% |
4 0.8% |
| Dallas• | 243 95.3% |
12 4.7% |
| Daviess• | 775 73.0% |
286 27.0% |
| De Kalb• | 400 67.0% |
197 33.0% |
| Dent• | 107 99.1% |
1 0.9% |
| Douglas• | 189 99.0% |
2 1.0% |
| Franklin• | 1,717 81.1% |
401 18.9% |
| Gasconade• | 862 82.3% |
185 17.7% |
| Gentry• | 525 65.1% |
281 34.9% |
| Greene• | 2,223 86.5% |
346 13.5% |
| Grundy• | 933 98.2% |
17 1.8% |
| Harrison• | 1,252 85.5% |
212 14.5% |
| Henry• | 465 66.7% |
232 33.3% |
| Hickory• | 365 99.7% |
1 0.3% |
| Holt• | 673 89.3% |
81 10.7% |
| Howard• | 534 98.9% |
6 1.1% |
| Iron• | 535 99.6% |
2 0.4% |
| Jackson• | 602 51.9% |
557 48.1% |
| Jasper• | 46 95.8% |
2 4.2% |
| Jefferson• | 915 73.9% |
323 26.1% |
| Johnson• | 832 78.8% |
224 21.2% |
| Knox• | 669 65.8% |
348 34.2% |
| Laclede• | 659 92.9% |
50 7.1% |
| Lafayette• | 346 46.7% |
395 53.3% |
| Lawrence• | 833 100.0% |
0 0.0% |
| Lewis• | 774 59.2% |
533 40.8% |
| Lincoln• | 542 60.3% |
357 39.7% |
| Linn• | 907 87.0% |
135 13.0% |
| Livingston• | 442 47.1% |
497 52.9% |
| Macon• | 1,757 98.7% |
23 1.3% |
| Madison• | 240 94.5% |
14 5.5% |
| Maries• | 215 46.8% |
244 53.2% |
| Marion• | 828 68.8% |
375 31.2% |
| McDonald• | 26 100.0% |
0 0.0% |
| Mercer• | 1,158 99.7% |
3 0.3% |
| Miller• | 555 83.3% |
111 16.7% |
| Mississippi• | 108 29.6% |
257 70.4% |
| Moniteau• | 866 66.6% |
434 33.4% |
| Monroe• | 158 20.9% |
597 79.1% |
| Montgomery• | 530 70.2% |
225 29.8% |
| Morgan• | 348 56.9% |
264 43.1% |
| New Madrid• | 99 91.7% |
9 8.3% |
| Newton• | 212 99.5% |
1 0.5% |
| Nodaway• | 829 98.9% |
9 1.1% |
| Osage• | 764 52.9% |
679 47.1% |
| Ozark• | 38 100.0% |
0 0.0% |
| Perry• | 509 81.4% |
116 18.6% |
| Pettis• | 879 68.9% |
396 31.1% |
| Phelps• | 985 78.9% |
263 21.1% |
| Pike• | 1,143 55.1% |
930 44.9% |
| Platte• | 496 36.0% |
882 64.0% |
| Polk• | 870 99.4% |
5 0.6% |
| Pulaski• | 105 78.9% |
28 21.1% |
| Putnam• | 1,292 96.5% |
47 3.5% |
| Ralls• | 292 60.1% |
194 39.9% |
| Randolph• | 484 59.7% |
327 40.3% |
| Ray• | 531 40.0% |
798 60.0% |
| Reynolds• | 7 25.9% |
20 74.1% |
| Saline• | 170 63.4% |
98 36.6% |
| Schuyler• | 546 74.1% |
191 25.9% |
| Scotland• | 612 53.4% |
533 46.6% |
| Scott• | 155 45.5% |
186 54.5% |
| Shelby• | 366 62.9% |
216 37.1% |
| St. Charles• | 1,438 78.5% |
394 21.5% |
| St. Clair• | 223 99.6% |
1 0.4% |
| St. Francois• | 246 64.7% |
134 35.3% |
| St. Louis• | 14,027 61.2% |
8,882 38.8% |
| Ste. Genevieve• | 423 66.1% |
217 33.9% |
| Stoddard• | 111 94.9% |
6 5.1% |
| Stone• | 100 100.0% |
0 0.0% |
| Sullivan• | 1,074 95.4% |
52 4.6% |
| Taney• | 29 100.0% |
0 0.0% |
| Texas• | 37 78.7% |
10 21.3% |
| Warren• | 948 77.8% |
271 22.2% |
| Washington• | 788 76.7% |
239 23.3% |
| Wayne• | 343 64.5% |
189 35.5% |
| Webster• | 533 73.5% |
192 26.5% |
| Worth• | 346 74.1% |
121 25.9% |
| Wright• | 65 97.0% |
2 3.0% |